Solid rods
#2
Posted 15 September 2010 - 11:12 AM
This post has been edited by stroke victim: 15 September 2010 - 11:15 AM
You have 2 choices - live on or die!! I ain't the dying type!!!
#3
Posted 15 September 2010 - 12:03 PM
If you are breaking rods then you are either flying in winds that are too strong for the rod you are using or you are contacting with the ground or other objects which are compromising the structure of the rod and causing it to fail.
If you are just testing to see if it is possible then by all means, test away and let us all know the results. I don't feel that it is necessary though and will probably give negative gains to your flying. Still, give it a try and see what happens. Experimenting is what fuels progress.
#4
Posted 15 September 2010 - 01:15 PM
The wind was in the range of 45 to 60 MPH. Location: Fano, Denmark
This photo is from June 1995.
STACK International Executive Committee - 6/1996-6/2008
International Rules Book Committee and STACK International Head Judge - 6/2004-6/2008
World Sport Kite Championship Judge - 2004-2005-2006(Chief Judge)
13x 1st - 12x 2nd - 6x 3rd places in 37 overall Quadline individual competitions
NEWLY REVISED Web Site - http://www.johnnmitchell.com Check it out today!
#6
Posted 15 September 2010 - 01:41 PM
awindofchange, on 16 September 2010 - 07:03 AM, said:
If you are breaking rods then you are either flying in winds that are too strong for the rod you are using or you are contacting with the ground or other objects which are compromising the structure of the rod and causing it to fail.
If you are just testing to see if it is possible then by all means, test away and let us all know the results. I don't feel that it is necessary though and will probably give negative gains to your flying. Still, give it a try and see what happens. Experimenting is what fuels progress.
I was just curious about it and wanted others thoughts.I'm flying the 3 wrap in pretty strong winds with no problems at all.I might just experiment just to see what happens,could be just like adding weights to the wings?
#7
Posted 15 September 2010 - 01:46 PM
stroke victim, on 16 September 2010 - 06:12 AM, said:
What is the reason for putting 2 and 3 wrap rods together
#8
Posted 15 September 2010 - 04:02 PM
David M, on 15 September 2010 - 05:46 PM, said:
Just to provide a little extra stiffness; it would really only be done if you had exactly one full-sail rev and 2 and 3 wrap frames; most folks would rather just switch to a mid-vent or even a full-vent. But you can double up any sticks in the leading edge depending on your conditions and gear. I've had situations in which I've used a 3 wrap and a 4 wrap leading edge together on a full-vent kite (team flying in 40mph winds)
#9
Posted 15 September 2010 - 04:55 PM
You have 2 choices - live on or die!! I ain't the dying type!!!
#10
Posted 15 September 2010 - 05:48 PM
stroke victim, on 15 September 2010 - 05:55 PM, said:
I was trying to break it too see how much the rods would take under constant strong wind driving it forwards and backwards. I did not succeed.
The big bends, some were more then the photo happened during reverse fights only.
STACK International Executive Committee - 6/1996-6/2008
International Rules Book Committee and STACK International Head Judge - 6/2004-6/2008
World Sport Kite Championship Judge - 2004-2005-2006(Chief Judge)
13x 1st - 12x 2nd - 6x 3rd places in 37 overall Quadline individual competitions
NEWLY REVISED Web Site - http://www.johnnmitchell.com Check it out today!
#11
Posted 16 September 2010 - 12:55 PM
You have 2 choices - live on or die!! I ain't the dying type!!!
#12
Posted 16 September 2010 - 06:40 PM
I can't think of a one, no matter what type it is or where it comes from.
STACK International Executive Committee - 6/1996-6/2008
International Rules Book Committee and STACK International Head Judge - 6/2004-6/2008
World Sport Kite Championship Judge - 2004-2005-2006(Chief Judge)
13x 1st - 12x 2nd - 6x 3rd places in 37 overall Quadline individual competitions
NEWLY REVISED Web Site - http://www.johnnmitchell.com Check it out today!
#13
Posted 06 December 2010 - 12:12 AM
The wind is too good here at the moment to not make an effort to get in the air again tomorrow : )
Any one want to field bets on how long it will last? (1990 rev1 in 12 knots average)
#14
Posted 06 December 2010 - 05:17 AM
The middle does nothing except keep the spacing between the inner and outer surfaces. That's why they leave it out of high strength-to-weight spars and beams - box beams, I-beams, tubes and the like.
A rod could be used as a repair for a broken tube, but it will never be as strong as the original tube. A stronger repair would be to glue a bigger tube around the outside of the break.
(sesquipedalian man)
#16
Posted 15 August 2011 - 08:18 PM
David M, on 15 August 2011 - 09:00 PM, said:
End caps on one set of rods, the others set will be held by the capped set. Just make sure all rods are connected properly to other rods in their respective sets.
STACK International Executive Committee - 6/1996-6/2008
International Rules Book Committee and STACK International Head Judge - 6/2004-6/2008
World Sport Kite Championship Judge - 2004-2005-2006(Chief Judge)
13x 1st - 12x 2nd - 6x 3rd places in 37 overall Quadline individual competitions
NEWLY REVISED Web Site - http://www.johnnmitchell.com Check it out today!
#17
Posted 16 August 2011 - 09:46 AM
As an example, KiteSquid made some mini-Ryvs (back in 2000 I think) using a 42 inch 2P Skyshark spine tube and the "no-sew" technique of sail assembly. A 6-pack of these will fly in zero wind on a 100 feet of line doing a slow 360 degree walk. But what happens if we take 'em to Jockey's Ridge or Buzzerkley? To test that theory fully, we tied two stacks together. The first 3 kites literally exploded, even shredding their sails.
His solution was to cut down a (point 125) carbon tube, a quarter inch longer (than the 42 inch Skyshark spars) and insert this stiffener inside the 2P tube. It's extra length makes it easier to withdraw when conditions return back to normal.
It works because the leading edge is a single tube with no ferrules, and the insert is also the same. . . . one fits into the other. You slap from one to 3 of these into the first few leading edge tubes to make a stronger frame. It can't bend as much so there's less chance of complete failure.
#18
Posted 16 August 2011 - 09:35 PM
kitecowboy, on 15 September 2010 - 04:20 PM, said:
I like the sle leading edge (that's redundant, isn't it?), especially in wind above 45 miles per hour. I drive into the ground with a hammer and anchor myself to it with my belt so the kite doesn't drag me away.
#19
Posted 17 August 2011 - 06:28 AM
(sesquipedalian man)
#20
Posted 17 August 2011 - 09:21 AM
--Pete, on 17 August 2011 - 10:28 AM, said:
Using tubes is a trade-off between structural efficiency and simplicity of design and manufacture. The same amount of material could support more bending load with a non-circular cross section, but you would need to have a mechanism that prevented the spar from rotating in the sleeve. Circular tubes are also easier to fabricate. The two limiting factors in how far you can push the material from the center line to gain stiffness are 1) buckling and 2) not exceeding the maximum stress in the extreme fiber.
As for the question of whether it adds any strength to a tube to insert a solid rod into it, the answer is yes. As Pete points out, it's not an efficient use of extra material/weight, but it will add stiffness and strength. And sometimes, as with ferrules, it's geometrically more convenient than more efficient options.
P.S. I love a forum where nobody complains about "necroposting".

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote







